While neologisms occur in living languages. It is uncommon to occur in a dead language. Since, the 1860 emergence of Greco-Bohairic Pronunciation, there has been an unwritten message that Coptic became like a constructed language, and anyone can just add a word. The first Coptic-Arabic dictionary contained neologisms, and since then, everyone is adding their own neologisms to the language with no regulation, and in most occasions with no qualifications in linguistics, phonetics or phonology. Some proponents of neologisms do not have adequate command of the language. The only exception is the words coined by Dr Emile Maher Ishak (PhD, Oxford), as he is a qualified linguist who is also interested in that field. Otherwise, it is usually ill-formed, grammatically incorrect, showing anglicisation or arabisation.
It would be helpful to think whether Copts named objects for their shape, or function or colour or texture, and whether they used loanwords, or coined new words, whether they created new terms or repurposed words. In essence, one should ask the question of How would have Copts named this object/concept?.
For example, ⲡⲓϫⲟⲙ which was used here to mean country, it means power not country or state, or government and the word is actually feminine not masculine
ϯⲙⲉⲧⲣⲉϥⲕⲱⲧ `ⲛϧⲏ كمال أجسام body building This neologism shows possible bias against Greek loanwords as the commonly used word for body is soma σωμα and the concept of building a body is an Anglicim (influence of how a construct is built in English), for example, the Arabic word mentioned could be translated as body perfection. We are also not sure how Copts would have thought of the concept.
ⲡⲓⲣⲉϥϭⲓⲙⲱⲓⲧ `ⲛϫⲟⲙ رئيس الجمهور president: this acutally mean power guide not president, and there are many words that serves the purpose better than that.
ⲡⲓⲣⲉⲙⲡϫⲟⲙ سياسي politician the term means the man who of/came from power. It is a vague term that does not specify clearly what is meant.The examples of neologisms that are not properly discussed is that they end up nowhere. My worry is that there lists like that on Coptic Wikipedia incubator, possibly others on various social media groups (Facebook, Instagram etc.) and on instant messaging apps eg (telegram, and WhatsApp).
Instead of asking for the input of experts like Dr Emile Ishak or Ibrahim Saweros or Gawdat Gabra, many people are just making up workd. This will eventually lead to chaos